Quote from: philiveyjr on September 05, 2016, 09:01:43 AM

Quote from: panjul07 on September 05, 2016, 08:36:49 AM

Quote from: Deuceisgood on September 05, 2016, 06:51:37 AM

Quote from: Milkduds on September 04, 2016, 05:52:22 PM

I think the next freeroll is in a hour,have not played this site yet but would like to see how the rng runs.
Looks like we need 30 players to run this,sign up fellas as the payouts look decent.

They need 30 players minimum to run, which means they will never run. This site is dead on arrival. RIP

They do not want to learn from other sites, there were many failed poker sites. Even those failed poker sites offered something better than what they have atm. One of them is bitcoin.gg, it was the best new poker site on 2015, but finally they closed down because they got less interest while in fact they offered better freerolls and better layout. I dont know why it is so hard to run bitcoin poker site while fiat poker sites are running very good (even without freerolls).

To add to this, Even NitrogenSports is trying to get their poker running, but even their tournies or cash games seem to be less popular these days. Poker overall is seeing a downward trend in general on all sites.

Nitro has never ran the poker side with efficient ideas. The reason cash is drying up on that site,is that they refuse to figure out how to combat the multi accounts in the freerolls. So now the cheats abuse the 100 hand and 1k hands as well,it makes it look bad for people wanting to play serious poker knowing that those cheats are kicking around.

The issue with freerolls having to high a player requirement to run seems to point to people trying to jumpstart a poker site with a small bankroll.
When Seals ran into trouble it opened the door for Nitro and I literally had to scream at them to take advantage of the opening,they never really did.
Any site could have jumped in and ran to the finish line. Now Nitro and Betcoin have it mostly on lock,till a legit site wants in on the small action.