Quote from: Riseman on September 11, 2016, 03:23:17 AM

Quote from: poloniexwhale on September 11, 2016, 03:18:38 AM

Quote from: Riseman on September 10, 2016, 11:34:25 PM

Quote from: burnomarsmellow on September 10, 2016, 07:57:52 PM

Why hasn't Poloniex listed Waves on their exchange?
Do you really think Poloniex will list a coin when the dev of the coin calls them names?
Do you really think Poloniex will list a coin were the devteam trades against their own investors?
Do you really think Poloniex will list a coin that has security breaches?
Do you really think...I can keep going on why Poloniex is not fond of listing Waves to their exchange.

I think the main issue with Polo listing is a centralized network without public nodes. It's just a legit security concern because the party that controls all the nodes can do everything it wants - doublespend coins, deny and roll back transactions and so on. I am not saying that the devs will actually do it but for an exchange it's an unacceptable risk. Because if things go south, it will affect the exchange reputation as well.

I don't think it has much to do with Sasha's public accusations. I know another coin with a dev that constantly trash talks Poloniex and all their favourite altcoins but his coin is listed and has 1-confirmation deposits like BTC.

Quote from: KoinMaster on September 10, 2016, 05:06:29 PM

Riseman: you are welcome to join #testnet-maintainers on Waves' Slack to see for yourself that what I am telling you is true.

It's no use. Most likely I'll be banned there very quickly Grin

Yeah, let's see will polo add waves or not after the full nodes releases, if they add it, so ypur explanation is correct. If not, may be another reason.

First, let's see if the nodes get released while Poloniex is still around and relevant. Or while this world is still around and relevant, lol.

or while crypto is still around and relevant. Or while the investors are still around..lol