Quote from: Altty on September 11, 2016, 06:02:25 PM

Quote from: murt9000 on September 11, 2016, 05:47:21 PM

Quote from: luckygenough56 on September 11, 2016, 06:20:29 AM

Quote from: murt9000 on September 10, 2016, 11:10:05 AM

Quote from: DecentralizeEconomics on September 10, 2016, 10:39:41 AM

Quote from: murt9000 on September 10, 2016, 10:28:29 AM

Quote from: DecentralizeEconomics on September 10, 2016, 10:03:14 AM

Quote from: murt9000 on September 10, 2016, 09:46:50 AM

Ping ya back in 1 year and we can check out the price of AMPs together.

Thanks for your constructive input.

Max amount of AMPs in the foreseeable future is 62.5M + 44M = 106.5M.

Source? If you can actually back that up with a legitimate source confirming that there are no plans to distribute the rest of the AMPs in the future, then it would actually address the concerns of many potential investors.

Let me save you some time. You can't back it up because the AMPs wouldn't have been created if there wasn't plans to distribute them in the future. I'm not psychic but I can foresee the effect that will have on the price.

The last I heard, the next crowdsale is 1.5 years after this one is finished. The first crowdsale had ~400M AMPs for sale. This crowdsale only has a MAX of 44M AMPs for sale. I doubt any future crowdsale will have more than 44M AMPs for sale, imo most likely less, and they're all going to be spaced at least 1.5 years apart from one another. Founders AMPs are locked up, and I seriously doubt they sell any significant portion any time soon. The rest of the AMPs are allocated to bounties, content creators, and user signups. None of these are going to result in a large dillution or any one person holding a large sum of AMPs. The crowdsales are going to be the major source of new AMPs coming to market, and as seen from the announcement, not many are up for grabs. The crowdsale AMPs are the funding source of Synereo, and they're not going to burn through them. The plan for Synereo is a long term one. Listen to the hangout sessions. In the last hangout session, Greg is talking about his vision for Synereo ten years into the future. Long term projects require long term funding. Do the math.

Exactly, no source to confirm that the supply will not exceed 106.5M in the future because your claim was baseless. You have instead confirmed that the first inflationary event is imminent and that there are additional inflationary events planned, in the foreseeable future. Each of these events will negatively impact the price and investor sentiment. You have made my point for me, thank you.

Not to forget private sales directly via website.
Anyway best news for amp would be detroying most of that supply, 1.6 billion is retarded. I never saw a coin with 5% of supply on market and 95% in dev wallets. Hell imagine that after that crowdsale, we're at 100 millions on market, even if dev had 200 millions in wallet it would twice market but they have 1.5 billion haha. Please rewrite your supply plan. Yes you would have less units for funding but those units would have far more value, especially for such an anticipated project, we're talking about ethereum magnitude here. So all in all, u don't lose.

Just sharing my thoughts.

They can't change it now, but I completely agree that they should. If they announced that they are going to destroy all, of most of their 1.6 billion premine at this stage, it would be an admission that they didn't think the distribution and funding model through very well. While many existing and potential investors would welcome the corrective action, they would also wonder what else has not been thought out very well. Flip-flopping on one important issue plants seeds of doubt concerning many other issues. This is how the house of cards starts to fall for many cryptos, and this is why comments such as this one must be labelled FUD by the founders. They must continue to project an image of confidence, professionalism and positivity, to avoid the real and justified FUD that a supply change would cause.

To reiterate, I think Synereo has real potential, but I will wait until the market has shown some adjustment for the progressive inflation that is inherent in AMPs. The founders don't have to listen to us, but they can't ignore the market, and it will explain the flaw in their model gradually, over the next couple of years.

Why could they not change it now? Isn't having too much better than having too little? Seems like a logical fix is there. Change the amount of coins coming out and make a strict rule.

The conference they just had was about governance. If this is governance then they must listen to the will of the community. The community is saying loud go ahead and raise more investment, but why are there 1.6 Billion coins? It seems like a simple fix to me. Just send most coins to an address to discard them. Use the rest for funding, and to run the network.

Maybe i didn't make my point as clearly as i thought. Technically they can change it now, but they won't for the reasons I explained in the comment.

This is not a governance issue. Governance is concerned with how decisions are made, not the outcome of the decision. A chance in governance could result in a change of distribution/funding model, but there's no guarantee because you are simply changing the process through which the decision is reached.