Quote from: korvas128 on September 15, 2016, 09:45:53 PM

Quote from: o0o0 on September 15, 2016, 08:02:28 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on September 15, 2016, 03:31:02 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on September 15, 2016, 11:39:09 AM

Your 50% of 10 or 20% of 1000 makes no sense. Regardless of volume apple takes 30% .... ionomy wants another chunk as big. So its actually >50% of 10 or >50% of 1000. Its the same as its a percentage... more volume doesn't mean more money percent wise.

Your percentages are not relevant, percentages don't keep the lights on. $$ margin does that, I gave you a reason why a dev would deviate from their norm

You say Bit vague hehe........... I'm just thinking through your scenario.

Now your confusing me THis is false information without justification. WTF

Did you really not understand anything I wrote ?

You're making really hard to understand your ramblings when you mess your posts up like that. Do proper quotes, don't quote the whole wall of text, get rid of the bolded crap, and respond to what the posters say, not what you think they say. o0o0 brought up a valid question, shouldn't be hard for you to answer since you're so diligent about all things ionomy:

Quote

Any dev would be better to pay 30% of profit to apple and keep 70%. Please state what "value" people get for the 30% ionomy wants. They already get apple exposure and can advertise through networks on per impressions ingames now. What is ionomy giving? You are a bit vague in your saying triple their revenue by monetizing new gaming element. Can you show how this figure is obtained as at present its an unsubstantiated claim. You can't just say can triple without showing how. THis is false information without justification.

How will ionomy triple the revenue for the developers?

korvas can you please answer this? you stated triple revenue but no justification.

percentages do keep the lights on. lets take $100
- with only apple 30% thats $70 to you
- with apple and ionomy thats $40 to you.

as you can see with the lower percentage your lights can stay on almost twice as long. can you please address my questions. its not baiting its valid rational questioning.

Of course your baiting

you know you need to take that comment in the context of the entire post.

so NO, if you don't get it I'm not one to teach

Its not baiting its an actual valid question. It seems to be a pattern here people make statements and when its questioned as to how they arrived at that statement the usual response is no i won't tell you if you can't figure it out for yourself or i don't give my secrets away etc.

I provided the percents taken and legitimately enquired as to why one would give that money to ionomy when they can take the profit themselves. I asked what ionomy gives for that 30% in cost value and you replied 50% of 10 or 20% of 1000 which is not correct. You mentioned tripling profits but didn't explain it.

My question isn't a bait because someones opinion is it is. So i'll pass it to you again to answer it. These questions answered do help those that want to invest as it shows stats that might make it a good position to take.