Quote from: franky1 on September 16, 2016, 12:57:19 AM

Quote from: exstasie on September 16, 2016, 12:53:05 AM

Quote from: franky1 on September 16, 2016, 12:49:16 AM

so abusing the consensus mechanism by not allow users to choose, thus not even giving any new rules a chance.

Anyone is free to choose. Why don't you fork the code and promote it? See if users actually support your fork? Why do people insist on leveraging hash rate to provoke users to change networks?

Just leave miners out of it. If forkers had support, they would fork, and the community would follow. That they refuse to fork and instead lobby miners to pressure the rest of us to fork is very telling.

the code of a 2mb block is not the problem.. even core agree 4mb is fine..

but there is drama and doomsday scenarios that stop a consensual fork.. not related to code.
but related to actually making implementations have the same rules.

core want to take bitcoin offchain and away from the original idea, and they will do this without nodes needing to vote.
there have already been 6 attempts to offer an onchain solution. but the debate has not been about code logic. but social illogics.

even now.. Luke JR is starting to recieve the R3kt campaign experience of social illogics, because luke wants to release a consensual hardfork using cores code.

again its not about code. but they want to attack the social illogics because the code allows true capacity growth. the activation parameters offers hassle free rule changes.. but because it puts a dent into the plan of moving users offchain and into sidechains, the social debate begins trying to kill off freedom of choice by using false doomsdays and personality attacks.

in short core want to be the sole decision makers. and even if one of their own wants freedom of choice, its time to throw them under the bus

You completely avoided what I asked. "Why don't you fork the code and promote it? See if users actually support your fork? Why do people insist on leveraging hash rate to provoke users to change networks?"

Instead you troll these forums day in, day out, talking shit about Core. What's the point? If people support the rule changes you propose, they will migrate to your fork. Endlessly insulting Core doesn't give merit to your fork.