Quote from: Xanidas on September 17, 2016, 06:00:25 AM

Quote from: ihanaihana on September 17, 2016, 05:40:11 AM

Quote from: MrPresident on September 17, 2016, 05:30:49 AM

Quote from: wavefan on September 17, 2016, 05:00:44 AM

Quote from: NotMyDay on September 17, 2016, 04:48:24 AM

I think everyone should respect decision of Iconomi dev so many people blaming about bounty campaign. Are you guys really support this project or just want free tokens and destroy it?

what decision you're talking about?i don't see any new rules for bounty campaign,but dev are trying to identify spam and bots accounts for twitter and facebook.

Yes it SUCKS reading over and over the whining, whimpering bounty wolves crying over and over for 100 pages.
It's bound to get worse before it goes away after the ico is done. IMHO Bounties should be closed right now to any new participants.
Then we can concentrate more on the things of greater interest like the platform, the mgmt funds, dividends, debit cards, voting and development!
All this bounty spammer BS is gobbling up Dev time and decreasing our profit potential.

You are right, we need to stop new participants to join, or the more bots will come. Also BCT signature campaign should not accept new participants.

stopping to accept new participants will only benefit those bounty hunter but not the ICONOMI itself, we need more exposure so we need more people to retweet tweets and for the bot, i believe they can sort things out and remove all of them

It would benefit ICONOMI and EVERYONE involved to stop accepting NEW bounty participants. Think about what you are saying...

1. All this spammer nonsense takes time to deal with, time which could be used in development and more important things.
2. Current HONEST participants will get a bigger share of the bounty, as it should be.
3. Spamming an ico can EASILY do more harm than good.
4. "More exposure" at the expense of irritating people will drive them away rather than interest them.
5. Quality exposure like articles in news sites and conferences is far more fruitful.
6. There's investors coming here for information reading 100 pages of bounty cries while searching for useful info trying to make a decision.

Now, do you REALLY feel it's more important to hand out 5 dollars to every Tom, Dick & Harry with 30 Twitter accounts? Or do you think we should drag this out 12 more days and bleed any possible advancements which could come from HQ during that time? You would rather they spend the next 12 days chasing spam bots so people with absolutely no vested interest can milk the bounty dry?