Quote from: denravonska on September 29, 2016, 05:12:24 AM

Quote from: aarons6 on September 29, 2016, 05:05:48 AM

Quote from: denravonska on September 29, 2016, 04:37:17 AM

No, that's not it. You mine a coin into the same coin but somehow 20 additional percent mysteriously vanishes. It's like digging for gold in somebody's gold mine. You mine 100 grams of gold in an arbitrary time period, expecting to get 98 grams in your pocket after the mining fee but instead you get 78 grams.

can these coins be mined with an amd gpu?

i can test it..

It has been tested. Check these ones:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1260863.msg16319232#msg16319232

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1260863.msg16332061#msg16332061

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1260863.msg16363973#msg16363973

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1260863.msg16311116#msg16311116

i dont know what im seeing in these posts.. but it seems its showing the block reward % based on shares, then when its paying out its different?

is it just a few different algos? it doesnt seem to be doing it with sha256.. i guess you cant really check very easily. since it strictly shows the payout in mbtc and id have no idea how many certain coins i mined..
but this seems to be the best pool for sha256..

i dunno if its been suggest but have you tried the yiimp authors pool with those coins to see if the code is flawed?
https://github.com/tpruvot/yiimp

http://yiimp.ccminer.org/

it has sib with zero miners, so all the coins would be yours and you can see if you get the exact correct amount..

im not sure what modifications crackfoo did to the code.. but if the coins are off in the base, it would show where the flaw is