Quote from: TwitchySeal on September 29, 2016, 12:23:25 PM

Quote from: MagicIsMe on September 29, 2016, 09:57:40 AM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on September 29, 2016, 07:47:16 AM

Quote from: TwitchySeal on September 29, 2016, 05:28:33 AM

Quote from: MagicIsMe on September 29, 2016, 05:11:03 AM

Now if only Zazarb can sign a message from that address...

ooo sneaky sneaky.

If he can't sign the message then it will be proof that he isn't you, right?

(wrong)

How did zazarb get dragged into this?

Sorry, typo. I meant Zarfund. And yes, I assume so. If he isn't able to sign a message from my wallet, then he isn't me.

That is the logic. Isn't that what you meant by:

Quote from: Timelord2067 on September 29, 2016, 07:46:34 AM

Given that you are unable to sign a message with that Wallet Address 1GaLLifreynEg6456XqDKYJYyBmyY2cJbw , you are not Timelord2067.

I would edit this with a signed message later on.

So, if he were you, then he (you) would sign the message without realizing that you (he) would be incriminating yourself (himself)?

Code:

Address: 15SDkNhpqVsJmzrBnvWtGJSs4jwWmv6v19

I, MagicIsMe, am the ONLY owner of this address. This disproves Zarfund's claim on this address as well as any future claims that further spread false information.

Signature: H1InjW+boWnZj6RixT8nK73zaTJlEDA2ZL9dC1burNf8QUTiYztr0wQ/bFhHmD3QJt0Kc9NUVOQsCRSDHC5Wiyc=

I am incriminating him of posting false information on his profile. By analyzing behaviour and the fact that he has never received any money to the address, this case can be dismissed.

@Timelord2067: Once again, thanks for giving me a chance to know about this before people start getting scammed by the impersonator.