Quote from: TheCrash on September 30, 2016, 06:32:12 AM

Quote from: Telenong on September 30, 2016, 01:19:48 AM

Quote from: Danslip on September 29, 2016, 05:10:41 PM

Quote from: Telenong on September 29, 2016, 03:29:15 PM

Quote from: vhong on September 29, 2016, 01:24:28 AM

Quote from: Myraidcoins on September 29, 2016, 01:08:59 AM

Quote from: benjamoyne on September 27, 2016, 11:32:26 PM

Quote from: Jumbley on September 27, 2016, 08:13:07 PM

Quote from: protonn on September 27, 2016, 07:25:27 PM

Quote from: IloveDigibyte on September 27, 2016, 02:03:09 PM

Quote from: needmoney on September 27, 2016, 07:40:39 AM

Quote from: gianni sperti on September 27, 2016, 07:24:12 AM

Quote from: DigiByte on January 12, 2014, 12:32:49 AM

Quote from: crunchynut on January 12, 2014, 12:25:26 AM

it takes max two hours to clone a "next generation" coin. or did you add any new features?

We are working on a coin mixing service as we feel true anonymity is paramount within a cryptocurrency. No, it was not added into the initial source code as it is still a ways off. We are also starting to work on a second generation light weight wallet. The coin is very fast as our intent was to make a coin so you could walk into Starbucks and buy some coffee within a minute. You have to start somewhere right?

So, after two years what is the situation with anonymity? What progress did you make?

I think firstly we need electrum wallet for fast and easy using.
People will use DGB more with electrum wallet at least i will use it

DGB does need a electrum wallet, the core wallet puts many people off.

I would recommend the devteam change the Electrum upstream to https://github.com/pooler/electrum-ltc and update, or if it isn't possible, refork from https://github.com/pooler/electrum-ltc and they should still be able to merge/commit many changes from the current DGB electrum repo.

You obviously know what you are looking at Protonn.
The old electrum wallet was started by a community member weve not seen for a good while now, so this project has pretty much been on a back burner forever. If you would like to pick up the ball and run with it youd be very welcome in our community, judging by the requests here.

Maybe we could organise a community bounty for this??

WTF a community bounty? Jared got handed $250k investment to market and develop this coin. The community should not be giving anything.

The question is how much money have been left out of $250k investment? If there is none community funding definitely needed.

whether you are the people who invest $250k? if not you have no right to ask jared
do not be stupid as though he is responsible to you

The 250 000 never existed but was good for MARKETING the coin at the time. Jared needs to work another angle for the next pump.

are you stupid? who pay booth fintech event? who pay transport fintech traveler? who pay hardware? who pay hosting? and many other
do you thing this all is free? built this all without money? dont make me laugh dude

You should look at syscoin, they are destroying dgb in development with NO funding.

fantastic!, destroying dgb in development with NO funding? please do it! Cheesy