Quote from: MyBTCLottery on October 05, 2016, 10:19:20 AM

Hello Users,

We will just response with a single posting to the wrongfull scam accussations
from user BitcoinDetector.

It's a fact that our affiliate system had a bug (which we fixed) and therefore it has shown
wrong high referral earning commissions for the user Bitcoin Detector (he used a different name).

He contacted us about his payout and we was looking into that account and issue profoundly.
We then contacted the user to inform that this commissions where based on a error and that
in fact where no earnings so far.

He reacted extremely rude and started to blackmail us that he wants at least a fee to have found
that "bug" and that he will start a negative campaign (which he have started now) if he don't get
a payment.

We call that blackmailing!

We love to pay our affiliate partners and we have paid every single user and partner as
we are a honest plattform. But we will not pay money for failed purchases or incomplete orders.
And we will clearly not pay money for a user trying to blackmail us.

After we informed the user that his affiliate account was terminated because of
harassing of our administrators, threats and the refusal to acknowledge the clear terms of our affiliate program,
he responded with a single phrase:

" Ok scammers, say goodbye to your little site. "

That say's about all about the user BitcoinDetector!

Better try to focus on your own sites and to not come up with wrongfull scam accussations
because you disagree with the clear terms of our affiliate program.

You site or traffic had not delievered any value to our plattform and it's just normal for every affiliate program
that we cannot pay commissions for "nothing".

You was enormously rude, that exclude the option for a goodwill offer.

Management
MyBTCLottery.com

Anything you just wrote doesn't give any kind of proof that those transactions didn't happen.
You can call it blackmailing, I can call it a scam. Your site shows that transactions were made.
At one point I even agreed that there is a possibility that it was indeed a "bug", and even agreed to get a smaller payout - even though by all means I should be requiring full amount because I have all the reasons to believe that transactions were made. That was actually very nice of me, but your best defense was that it was "blackmailing". It's common praxis in Bitcoin development to reward a person who helped you find a bug. So I tried going with that and was willing to accept a smaller amount and let it all go. Still - I didn't even have to offer that solution, because I should have been claiming all of it.
My ref link didn't bring any traffic? Your site said completely opposite.
I'm not even mad about the loss, and as for "negative campaign" - why not give people a warning that something didn't go well with service?
Me sending you that last message and calling you scammers - what was I supposed to do? Send you flowers and a box of fine chocolates?