Quote from: DarkStar_ on October 10, 2016, 05:22:32 PM

Quote from: smho_16 on October 10, 2016, 04:39:08 PM

There is no strategy in gambling. If it were some kind of strategy that would worked on chance games like the dice being discussed here a lot of people would be rich by now.

Arbitrage in sportsbetting is a legitimate strategy. Coding a bot that plays +EV on bustabit is a strategy. While people won't get rich from +EV playing, some people are rich from arbitrage betting.

Quote from: MartinL on October 10, 2016, 04:42:30 PM

Playing the devil's advocate: Removing bonuses while leaving the instant busts unchanged, thereby more than quadrupling the effective house edge, would likely not be received well by bustabit's player base. The site operator knows the game results in advance and also every player's wager size. He could use this information advantage to skim off the top of the bonus pool, which would largely go unnoticed by players.

However, I fully agree with you. Ryan has operated bustabit without any incidents since he purchased it two years ago and has never given any cause for distrust.

Fair point. He could just lower the bonuses though, and still keep the house edge moderately low. Skimming the bonus pool would be very risky for him - he can't use his own account so he will have to make new accounts, and people might get very suspicious if those new accounts kept cashing out almost right before it busts, and people would eventually download the game history and analyze it if people get too suspicious.

It's so easy for the master to have lots of robots to skim off the bonus.

People will not analyze the history .its time costing . Even u found it you can not make people believe u.most people just care about win or lose.

The house edge of bustabit is 2%. So if u are clever enough please keep away from bustabit