Quote from: DooMAD on October 16, 2016, 08:48:09 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on October 16, 2016, 08:21:01 PM

To illustrate further:

Presumably, as someone who identifies with the right label, you're a big fan of:

~~Monarchies~~ Centralised development (literally the opposite of freedom and self determinism)
~~Banning recreational drugs~~ Outcries over modified code (wanna mess with the freedom of others, huh)
~~Police state thuggery against vulnerable people~~ Tirades against developers of alternative clients (but they're all ~~criminals~~ dictators just waiting to happen though, right?)
~~Heavily patrolled national borders and restrictive policies for foreigners to cross~~ Protectionism for "sovereign code" to deter competing protocols (tekkin' yer ~~jobs~~ code? What about the free-market?)

I can't think of one for "Traditional family values", anyone care to lend a hand? Grin

Something about fork proposals being a sin, perhaps. Roll Eyes

1) Centralized development of private property duh, the Core code is the property of their developers (and despite this you can use it for free under MIT license I believe). However they have the github keys, and the commit access. Sorry but they deserve that right. Make your own wallet if you dislike it.

2) No, it's the modified code that messes with the freedom of others. GAMBLING FILTER in Knots, and TRAFFIC SHAPING & Targeted Bloom Filters in Unlimited, is kinda fishy...

3) They want to take away the freedom from gamblers, and from the nodes (if 2mb is enforced, tons of nodes will leave)

4) Well yes, its their private property, duh...