Quote from: RealBitcoin on October 16, 2016, 08:52:48 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on October 16, 2016, 08:21:01 PM

●Banning recreational drugs (wanna mess with the freedom of others, huh)

Nope, not ban, but discourage. Drugs encourage degenerate behaviour, so it should not be promoted, but I would be in favor of legalizing it to stop this drug war mess.

Discourage? With what? Fines? Jail?

Recreational drugs can encourage positive behaviour as well as negative behaviour, responsible use leads simply to people having fun. Sometimes they can have significant cultural influence, like the effect MDMA had on shaping the electronic music scene in the 80's and 90's. It's sometimes suggested that psychoactives like mushrooms, cactii or cannabis may have played a role in the long term evolution of the hominid brain, although I'm don't totally subscribe to that theory.

And it seems that you're a little too interested in the lives of people that are otherwise simply choosing to do something that only really affects them. I accept that habitual use of extreme drugs like smoked meth or crack cocaine is unlikely to end well, but freedom includes the freedom to make mistakes.

Quote from: RealBitcoin on October 16, 2016, 08:52:48 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on October 16, 2016, 08:21:01 PM

●Police state thuggery against vulnerable people (but they're all criminals just waiting to happen though, right?)

Nope, if you have read my posts, you would know that i am anti-tyranny.

Yes, but I'm still interested to hear how it is you would like drugs to be discouraged without tyranny though!

Quote from: RealBitcoin on October 16, 2016, 08:52:48 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on October 16, 2016, 08:21:01 PM

●Traditional family values (it says in the Bible "let no man put asunder", therefore your divorce is a sin!)

Yep, divorce makes children unstable and traumatized. Of course I am anti -divorce.

In principle, me too. Should authorities be involved in either marriage or divorce though, that's what I'm really getting at. It's one thing to have an opinion, yours and mine are the same or similar. It's another thing to say what you think should happen about it.

How about this: why not let people get married and divorced without anyone to officiate? Who's business is it when two people wish to make a new family together, other than that of the spouses? Blockchain could do that job IMO

Quote from: RealBitcoin on October 16, 2016, 08:52:48 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on October 16, 2016, 08:21:01 PM

●Heavily patrolled national borders and restrictive policies for foreigners to cross (tekkin' yer jobs? What about the free-market?)

This depends. If we are talking about private property, then you obviously need to protect it. If a nation is a collective property of the citizens, then it needs to be defended.

I am not saying to build a huge wall ,or put sentry guns every 100 meters, but definitely a border security is needed.

Uh-oh, collectivist authoritarian detection! Nations are artificial to a large extent, and you can't be saying government is by nature oppressive and corrupt, and simultaneously grant the same institution the power to police borders as a monopoly on force.

Let's put it another way: do you know which year national borders, and the passports needed to cross them, were introduced? Clue: not as long ago as you might think.

Quote from: RealBitcoin on October 16, 2016, 08:52:48 PM

So as you can see, right-wing libertarianism is very possible, in fact it's the best system.

As opposed to left wing, entirely, it devours itself.

I fear you may never get it.

I'm trying to demonstrate to you that Libertariansim involves aspects of politics that the left and the right detests. What you're demonstrating is that you're not as Libertarian, or as rightist, as you would have us believe.