Quote from: Orestes on October 18, 2016, 08:45:28 PM

Quote from: dontigua on October 18, 2016, 08:15:02 PM

That there will not be adequate promotion of the project until the rebranding is finished, already a low liquidity market and a few months more indecisiveness will likely kill it. More a question of, likely good time to sell to wait for this coin to choose its path? The new year is a long ways away to wait for final direction and can't advertise something that doesn't exist.

The Silk project has been underground for a long time but progress has always been made. At a 25:1 rate we off a swap for those that want to switch from SLK to DSLK, DSLK being released Nov 5th.

DSLK with the Stormnode reward structure might attract more liquidity and could be a great opportunity. The future of SLK as stated before is tied to the success of DSLK. No matter the outcome of the rebrand this will remain. Investors do need to take into account that SLK is a long term investment.

Okay. But it is not SLK or DSLK. Hence the confusion and the problem.
You have names you're not saying, partnerships you're not disclosing for the name change, and a marketer to come when previously stated finalising new year and now I'm told I'm pulling words out of thin air? I quoted the exact reference to the new year. I'm not making things up.

You guys ask for money for an ico and then decide to change the name after you take the investors money. A little more care and concern for investors would be appreciated.