Quote from: Lauda on October 19, 2016, 03:46:52 PM

I've already mentioned this at least once. Imagine a crime where 3 entities are involved, and only 1 always gets punished for it. That's what has been going on BTCT for a while (albeit even less effectively in 2016). What should be done is, punish everyone involved:
1) Ban the spammers themselves.
2) Ban the managers.
3) Ban the service.

If the service does not care about the spam, then it should not be allowed any kind of back-linking from BTCT period.

Quote from: Wendigo on October 19, 2016, 12:23:09 PM

Easiest way is to disable all signatures for all users and that will repel 99% of the signature spammers.

That's the last and most drastic solution to this problem.

Quote from: poptok1 on October 19, 2016, 11:39:42 AM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545652.0
It was already introduced as concept in this thread.

No. That project never took off (i.e. has failed) and even some of those managers are inadequate (e.g. yahoo62278).

I think we need more mods and more good mods that deserve better salary. Banning by association is like North Korean Laws. Your banning the managers, but what about those members that follow the rules? They will be ruined too without doing any mistakes. This a conflict of interest on your part because you have own signature campaign firm.