Quote from: DaniellPlasmmer on October 19, 2016, 05:47:53 PM

Quote from: Daparski on October 19, 2016, 05:43:35 PM

Quote from: DaniellPlasmmer on October 19, 2016, 05:33:15 PM

Quote from: MrPresident on October 19, 2016, 05:25:53 PM

Quote from: DaniellPlasmmer on October 19, 2016, 03:16:07 PM

Quote from: JamesSany on October 19, 2016, 03:13:20 PM

So finally there is no account swap possible as replied from Jani.people can ask refund who sent BTC to escrow,must provide tx hash.

Is it secure? Anyone can send any tx to the escrow. Person need PROVE the ownership of the sending address.

That offer has ended.

Quote from: DaniellPlasmmer on October 19, 2016, 04:02:28 PM

Move ICONOMI to Lisk, why not?

As much as I would LOVE that, lisk simply isn't ready. We could "make it happen", but it would violate our roadmap. Lisk is meeting with Iconomi actually right now sharing DDoS setups... who knows, could change.

Quote from: boestin on October 19, 2016, 04:23:14 PM

True. Also Iconomi, what if ultimately Ethereum fails. What is the backup scenario?

LSK, NXT, Counterparty...
Counterparty is stable and an excellent option.

Quote from: enhu on October 19, 2016, 05:14:06 PM

WAVES i think would be much better. This time let get this fix for the release is very much awaited by tons of us excited to see ICN on the exchange and what it can offer in the future. We'd like to see it live.

Waves? No! If that were to happen I would dump 100% at launch. Many others would do the same.

We have yet to get an update guys... the test contract may have deployed without issue; we just need wait for an official update.
ANYTHING ELSE IS PURE SPECULATION or FUD at this point.

Why Waves isn't good?
Can Lisk be better than Counterparty?

We still need to give ether network a chance.
Regarding other platforms - my main concerns are:
1. Iconomi would be the first major project deployment. Not good idea when it comes down to managed funds platform.
2. Liquidity. If you look at the trading volume of all other alternatives, it can be a major problem for high volume weekly transactions.

Bitcoin would be the best option, but it is expensive.
So it looks like we stay with ether for now.

Bitcoin?

I've never hear about Bitcoin as platform for DAPPs/custom asset tokens.

Bitcoin as paying dividends. Not as a platform for asset tokens