Quote from: pharesim on October 19, 2016, 06:32:24 PM

I agree that the asset investment should've been announced, or generally handled more transparently.

True.

The linked RokOS purchase had already shown how clever a consensus can be reached to spend such collectivized funds (via phased transaction). How come the foundation fell back below that? Public is good. And if only because other HZ projects might have stepped forward if it had been handled in public. Public is good in any case.

Quote from: duncan_idaho on October 19, 2016, 06:25:15 PM

Here is orignial Horizon thread. I have no time to follow slack of every single coin.

Same for me. All types of non-async communication is mainly a time eater. Good to quickly coordinate stuff, but only for a core team.
(I had joined slack & discord now, to find out if anyone understands the pump, but I can not afford to be there often I guess).

I understand that from the low volume in this thread you had assumed "no one" is reading it, which is not true for me by the way, I had been here often, checking what is going on.

But anyways ... the foundation have spent most remaining funds to support those 2 active HZ projects. So that's done. I'd say let's move on:

IMHO those 2 projects should now publish a detailed report how they are using and will be spending the funds to take care of HZ - and publish that, and also here in this thread.