Quote from: 1Referee on October 21, 2016, 09:57:44 PM

Looks like Lauda has been going strong with cleaning up the Bitmixer campaign. If that means that I get banned as well, then it is what it is. But it's a good effort to keep the forum clean.

You won't get banned. At worst, you will just get kicked from the campaign

Quote from: deisik on October 19, 2016, 04:47:09 PM

Quote from: Lauda on October 19, 2016, 03:46:52 PM

I've already mentioned this at least once. Imagine a crime where 3 entities are involved, and only 1 always gets punished for it. That's what has been going on BTCT for a while (albeit even less effectively in 2016). What should be done is, punish everyone involved:
1) Ban the spammers themselves.
2) Ban the managers.
3) Ban the service.

If the service does not care about the spam, then it should not be allowed any kind of back-linking from BTCT period

Even if all they care for is only exposure, this still doesn't mean that they are deliberately encouraging spammers. I think that any service would prefer good posters to spammy ones. There may be just not enough good posters currently looking for participation or the payment is too low that only compulsive spammers get attracted by such a campaign. But in any case, it is a campaign manager who first agrees to manage a signature campaign for the service and then indiscriminately accepts participants into it...

Therefore, the campaign managers are the ones who should be dealt with and where it will be most effective

It seems that I turned right in the end. Ironically, the most spammy service across the forum that was first in line to get banned has hired the most strict moderator here to get rid of spammers. Who could ever think of anything like that just a day ago? In short, you never know. On the other hand, I've seen a lot of Russian posters wearing the Bitmixer signature, and I'm curious how she is going to deal with them...

After all, they might kick her down themselves