Quote from: Sergey_Inchain on October 22, 2016, 08:07:42 AM

Quote from: SpacemanOne on October 22, 2016, 01:04:17 AM

Quote from: Sergey_Inchain on October 21, 2016, 01:23:31 PM

In the model, the list of exchanges pointed as an example.

As I can see now the whole model is an example that could possible be implemented and could possibly not. Excuse me, I thought it was a real model, not an example. Why? Maybe because there were no writings like 'This is an example', 'Do not take it serious' or 'our future financial model is not defined yet', 'this is just a concept', etc.
I've read your blog post carefully, examined all the details, tried to verify your numbers. I spent some time studying it. And now it turns out this is just an example and your real financial model may be absolutely different.
You can consider me as your first fooled potential investor.
The only thing we know for sure about the model is that there will be some insurance for exchanges and web wallets. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Hi, thank for the opinion.
You are wrong. This model demonstrates operational financial scheme of Inchain. As I wrote, the list of exchanges is an example, to understand what exchanges & web-wallets may participate in insurance process we need to finalise risk model and check every exchange & web-wallet to assess their risk rating. Only after that it will possible to decide which exchanges or web-wallets have enough risk rating to participate in Inchain insurance.

Actually, I expected for some excuses for not warning the community that you financial model is just an example and the real model will be different. You wrote that your exchanges list is an example in 30 days after the post was published. No warnings in the blog text.
Would you show this financial model to a venture investor? I doubt. Even if you did you wouldn't get the money.
So why do you show it to the community? Because you think they won't read it or will just trust you without any verifications.

If you say I'm wrong please tell me where I'm wrong.
All the numbers from your financial model are not real and will be different in the real product.
Number of exchanges - not real.
Each exchange share - not real.
Insurance premium - not real.
Coupon rate - not real.
Total amount insured - not real.
Thank you for mentioning about your survey and saying that conditions are 'editable'.

So if all the above numbers are just an example why do finalize your post with words 'As you can see Inchain earns in each case'? The conclusion is based on the example numbers that are far from reality. So you should write 'As you can see from our example InChain can be profitable but only with the numbers we gave you. They will be different in reality'. That would be fare at least.

Are you sure there will be bonds in your real financial model?
Are you ready to give me 100 BTC if there will be no bonds in your real financial model?