Quote from: crysx on October 23, 2016, 02:27:16 AM

Quote from: sugarfly on October 22, 2016, 06:00:19 PM

Quote from: rhinomonkey on October 19, 2016, 10:58:41 PM

Quote from: georgem on August 30, 2016, 09:14:17 AM

- multihost capabilities that allow you to run multiple nodes in your local network, remote controlling them with your spreadwallet.
- easy setup and control through SSH of all the raspberry pis in your local network.

I am gonna post this here so that I remember to ask again in the future when Georgem is less busy developing than he is now. But will these features eventually be extendable to remote servers? That would be awesome.

I asked myself the same thing.

Raspberry Pi's are supposed to be run at home.
In your local network.
Local networks are usually well secured against outside influences.
They are sitting behind a router.

If you let the Spreadwallet manage remote servers you would have way more security concerns.
But people are already managing their servers/nodes from afar,
so sure, why not?

Wink

-sf-

agreed ...

as long as there is a fully functional api - a port / link - and full accessibility to the api ... then there should be no reason why remote accessibility could not be available ...

there will always be security concerns - as with any form of remote accessibility ... but that is par for the course ...

that will be a georgem 'thing' to build if it is to be implemented ...

#crysx

That's good to hear. It will make running the Service Nodes far easier if we can control them through the Spreadwallet - especially when there are updates. What security issues exist with operating remotely?

I'm assuming we would eventually be able to have our collateral stored in Trezor wallets which would greatly reduce any possibility of coin theft if that is a large risk with remote operation.