Quote from: cr1776 on October 31, 2016, 04:37:34 PM

Quote from: findftp on October 31, 2016, 03:17:09 PM

...
I mean, for me it would make some sense to make it sync with the block reward period which is 210000 blocks.
2016 is not a factor of 210000.

Was this done deliberately? Yes, of course it was, but why?
...
Why did Satoshi not sync this to the block reward period and use 2000 or 2100 blocks(which are both a factor of 210000), which 2000 as most obvious round number.

...

Regarding syncing with the block reward period, there was also some intent to avoid having both occur simultaneously to decrease the variability of having two events occur at the same block.

Sounds legit, thought of this also.

Then we can also completely ignore that this was my 2016th post... Got nothing to do with it... Wink

Edit,.. and my activity being exactly half of it, 1008... Huh