Quote from: MoveCrypto on November 01, 2016, 04:06:28 AM

Quote from: snkns on November 01, 2016, 03:54:22 AM

Quote from: MoveCrypto on November 01, 2016, 03:36:32 AM

If you are really confident that Bittrex or Poloniex won't list ICN

I think they won't list before some news about SEC status for Iconomi. That might be something as simple as an opinion letter. Whether that happens before February, I have no idea.

You need to do a better job of reading to see what my positions actually are instead of just assuming stuff. I've bought more ICN on Kraken. Have not sold any.

You still have not given a good explanation for why Kraken, Bittrex, Poloniex would all list other tokens that pay ETH dividends like DAO and REP, but then suddenly 2 out of 3 of these exchanges would have a regulatory fear of listing ICN, another ETH-dividend-paying token.

Here is Kraken's ICN address:
https://etherscan.io/token/ICONOMI?a=0xcf40d0d2b44f2b66e07cace1372ca42b73cf21a3

If you scan through the withdrawals, you will see several addresses that have been steadily withdrawing from Kraken.

This 140k ICN address was filled entirely by 13 withdrawals from Kraken over the past 5 days:
https://etherscan.io/token/ICONOMI?a=0x57945f3123fa83bac7a8733a057912acd566dac4

This 124k ICN address was filled entirely by 6 withdrawals from Kraken over the past 5 days:
https://etherscan.io/token/ICONOMI?a=0xf7dc251196fbcbb77c947d7c1946b0ff65021cea

The owners of such addresses have an incentive to spread fear in order to get their buy orders filled before ICN price launches.

What its that, and for what ??