Quote from: Rassah on November 06, 2016, 05:41:26 PM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on November 05, 2016, 05:50:40 PM

NAME	~~NULL~~	ADDRESS	REMIT
_
_
thomkaufmann...	~~1.0~~	13ULMdY3Rd3Ax4amphDBKeCiEsM78xTmJW	0.4378
partyp	~~0.19822391~~...	1Gm6SNXwTAnCQsKQVd33e44sDC6F8bsTmo...	0.19822391
GoWest	~~6.0~~	1Ccz22btKWZEmccpPb2DFfx9JzWzhdbTVw	2.6268
dancupid	~~4.204114~~	1EQGrHozsR52n7Hkdb2MLj33f5S5UdtbHZ	1.8405611
clouds	~~1.0~~	17LeJg5tVeXaDvrcJ524f9kzB2VTfyrk7Q	0.4378
gnar1ta$	~~8.0~~	1AR8gJfoZPrQD8hn8xYjnrpy8U1BaYiomW	3.5024
MaxSan	~~3.839~~	1N8E3TGi7uY1KSUutF6AvAmw8nxmvL57aT	1.6807142
DiThi	~~1.0~~	3NEg945w55arHRFoU3SGjXRJtgje3kpQis	0.4378

Next transaction of magic internet moneys sent: https://blockchain.info/tx/762dc51e2cd71cd32a03bf10236d328959681faa723ccacc31394a0a81a8a695

Regarding your find, I do not partake. And unfortunately that was the entire attendance Tongue

Like I stated and quasi-confirmed, I happened upon the article by pure chance, not giving it a second thought if do 'partake', bud. I'd say the article was bigger than the turnout, with the author, you and DeRose making up 30% of the participants, with, perhaps, other media reps rounding out-cum-surpassing the majority of those present. So odd!

Meanwhile, I'm about to link BTC to the txID on the table in the OP. Since my last login and your reply/remittance process, two more users have PM'ed me. I'll let them know that you'll get to them in a timely manner, bud, coupled with amending this post with their vitals. Looks like Ricochet's gonna have to past a test, along with perhaps k (complete user name), due to having 2013 and early 2016, respectively, last login dates.

Just a couple hours ago or so I amended the top of the OP, outlining that a process is in place for users of accounts which sat dormant for a [long] spell.

Thanks again, Rassah.

Bruno