Quote from: CryptoDatabase on November 12, 2016, 11:09:13 AM

-snip-
A good signature campaign manager will do their job and inspect every account applying for their campaign.

Which takes time.

Quote from: CryptoDatabase on November 12, 2016, 11:09:13 AM

If by 'doing nothing' you are referring to campaign managers doing nothing to ensure they are committed to the job they were hired for then sure. It shouldn't be difficult to click on someones trust and read a neutral feedback. That is if the campaign manager isn't just a lazy scammer suckering people in with lies and false security.

But the lazy ones get the job, because they are cheaper. They can afford to be cheaper because they have to invest less time. The majority of campaigns with spammer problems are those where the manager is hard to reach or is barely active here.

Quote from: CryptoDatabase on November 12, 2016, 11:09:13 AM

As for Laura being staff, is there a point in this being mentioned?

Yes, I answered "whoever Laura is"

Quote from: CryptoDatabase on November 12, 2016, 11:09:13 AM

I really couldn't care if she was the pope. I said what I said for a reason, someones position in a forum isn't going to change my view.

Staff usually does not have to change someones view, they enforce the view of the admin how certain situations are to be handled. In this case however Lauda is unable to, because they are not given to powers needed to ban spammers. The trust rating is a crutch.

Quote from: rizzlarolla on November 12, 2016, 11:52:09 AM

"Daisy14" account - your situation.

You are part of "at least" 4 accounts,
-snip-

good job.