Quote from: CoinHoarder on November 18, 2016, 04:51:36 AM

* I still argue PoW is not permission-less, but can concede it is much more permission-less than all forms of PoS.

You aren't even close to guessing my design. I am going to turn your entire understanding of tradeoffs between PoW and DPoS upside-down. For example, I make a non-PoW design more permissionless than PoW.

Quote from: iamnotback on November 18, 2016, 07:37:07 AM

Quote from: robelneo on November 17, 2016, 11:12:25 PM

Quote from: Rooster101 on November 17, 2016, 09:25:36 PM

With many new cryptocurrencies sprouting in the net, is it possible that bitcoin can be overtaken as a top digital currency in the future? Is ethereum or other well known cryptocurrencies can be a threat to bitcoin dominance?

Maybe yes or maybe no,crypto currency is evolving,another inovation in crypto currency may come tomorrow

Not tomorrow but the "Bitcoin killer" is coming...

Quote from: @AnonyMint's whitepaper

The technical innovation of this paper combines the unbounded participation of [redacted] with the bounded election of [redacted]; and which entirely ameliorates the power-law distributions otherwise deleterious ability to dictate transaction fees (or analogously the distribution of minted dilution as a substitute for transaction fees), double-spend, and/or censor transactions.

Note I should add that even a 100% attack can't double-spend nor censor transactions. This will sound loony to those who are knowledgeable, but it is only because they don't yet understand the paradigm-shift.