Quote from: Lauda on November 20, 2016, 09:35:00 PM

Quote from: xhomerx10 on November 20, 2016, 09:27:07 PM

Sure. I don't believe the situation is so dire that we can't take the time to do it properly.

Choosing someone who's partly inactive or semi-active when the need for a active global moderator arises is counter-intuitive.

Okay, wait. This is not what I was talking about! In his own words, Achow101 forgot to include one of the staff. I'm saying we need to ensure no person is left behind before proceeding. If a mod is not logging in regularly, that's a totally different story and not what I was originally concerned about.

Quote from: Lauda on November 20, 2016, 09:35:00 PM

Quote from: xhomerx10 on November 20, 2016, 09:27:07 PM

This remedy still requires all who already voted to notice there was a change and I doubt people are going to keep checking the thread when it bumps since that happens every time there is a vote.

There's plenty of time to fix your vote. I'm pretty sure that the error rate would be marginal in the end.

You're probably right.