Quote from: kaicrypzen on November 23, 2016, 10:58:23 AM

Quote from: massnetwork on November 22, 2016, 02:45:57 PM

We don't "hire" an escrow because we can not understand what it means. Who exactly is good enough for us just to give a spare key of the apartment and 2FA to the e-mail account? Who's that? Someone that can be "hired"? This is nonsense. Barack Obama? Would he be interested.

This is not about who is "good for you" or not, an escrow shouldn't be good enough for you, it just should be trustworthy in the community of investors. If people on this forum trust some other people on this forum as being able to provide a safe escrow in case, for whatever reason, the asker tries to run with their money, then I think you should give this option more thoughts, or do all you can to win the trust of the forum users. Anyway, as we've discussed before, the choice is yours, you might just get fewer investors on Bitcointalk, and maybe you don't need their investments, in this case that's settled.

Quote from: massnetwork on November 22, 2016, 02:45:57 PM

"Escrow" is just part of the scam genre. You don't need an escrow if you just sell an app coin. You can't have an escrow if you got something that's valuable.

If you are not holding an ICO, you surely don't need an escrow, aren't you holding an ICO?

The dev is relying on the team reputation not to hold an escrow,so it is up to them,we;ll know if this kind of set up is good for their project or not,we;ll know after the ICO is over ,anyway goodluck to this project.