Quote from: Lauda on November 24, 2016, 12:25:47 AM

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on November 24, 2016, 12:21:56 AM

i just dont want core to block scaling via block size

You're completely dodging the argument which is fallacy.

can you repeat the question?

Quote from: Lauda on November 24, 2016, 12:25:47 AM

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on November 24, 2016, 12:21:56 AM

because once we have LN, core devs will say things like " the settlement layer must remain DECENTRALIZED,

False assumption.

ya right.

Quote from: Lauda on November 24, 2016, 12:25:47 AM

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on November 24, 2016, 12:21:56 AM

if you have a problem with the 10$ fees go learn how to use LN, you dumb users that can hardly turn on a computer!"

Appeal to extremes.

is it really all that extreme?

..
(Fee: $ 0.97 - Size: 192 bytes) 2016-11-24 00:26:22
(Fee: $ 5.77 - Size: 1554 bytes) 2016-11-23 23:42:28
(Fee: $ 3.00 - Size: 223 bytes) 2016-11-23 23:42:06
...

Quote from: Lauda on November 24, 2016, 12:25:47 AM

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on November 24, 2016, 12:21:56 AM

sometime cores act like users are going to lose funds because the user didnt upgrade in time.

I've yet to see this somewhere.

no shit they wouldn't flat out say that, they want you to FEEL like hard forks are very dangerous.

Quote from: Lauda on November 24, 2016, 12:25:47 AM

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on November 24, 2016, 12:21:56 AM

user wakes up, everything APPEARS to work fine, and unknown to him a softfork has been activated.

Yet everything continues to work just fine even after a soft fork. This is a moot point.

right, core devs are infallible programming gods, so i guess there's no real danger.