Quote from: BlockchainOS on November 24, 2016, 06:52:05 AM

It might be better if you could give the exact amount of bounty.. at least percentage

Welcome!, Sorry i dont understand your question. The amount of each bounty (marketing, development, etc) are agreed with each individual user. We are using a lot of our own funds at this moments.

Quote from: P4ndoraBox on November 24, 2016, 05:42:25 AM

Interested.

Quote from: Cryptotraider16 on November 24, 2016, 05:26:23 AM

real real interestedc coin...good

Thanks! and welcome aboard!

Quote from: Cryptotraider16 on November 24, 2016, 05:19:40 AM

real interested....what % is pos!?

All the coins, we will distribute 95% with the ICO and as you can find in the specifications we have 3% annual interest.

Quote from: TheKB on November 24, 2016, 06:46:22 AM

1. Roadmap

2. Solution to Zcash Problems

3. Alliances

4. Escrow

5. DarkWeb Connections

TheKB, how are you?, let me answer you each point:

1) About our development roadmap, as we said we are using the zcash code with three changes. This changes are particularly important and will allow the expansion of our project and his extensive use in dw. Zcash weaknesses were detected to create a better version. Plus to fork each zcash updates, we will add our own features to our project, not included in Zcash. We are not thinking about that, because is not the most important right now. We are open to suggestions like thezerg did. His suggestion is still valid and we will study about that. By the way we are open to more suggestions.

2) Sorry but I don havet answer for this, what is your specific question? 5% is really low amount of premine (the majority of project take 10-20 % as premine) and will be in a public address, so everyone could see if we spend it or not. The founder rewards on Zcash generate a sales pressure hard to maintain.

3) The agreements reached with each particular company will not be disclosed as it is obvious. But if you doubt the legitimacy of them you can consult with any of the companies named for the moment. We made a tweet to announce it and as far I know will be RT or comment for this companies to give it legitimacy (EDIT: Check https://twitter.com/BitLox/status/801621601280258049 - https://twitter.com/CoolBitXCOO/status/801697785300992000). More agreements will be revealed in the coming weeks. This is to create an ecosystem for Ebitz from the first day and to have a real use (and not be another useless coin).

4) It does not make sense, they are two different things. For the move we made with SebastianJu we use our own private funds and was a pretty low amount. If we reach our goal and we continue with our plans we will make some enemies for the nature of our proposal and that can become a witch hunt that we want to avoid. As we said before in our group are different views about this. But we have not made our final decision yet. During the weekend will be published our final decision. If our decision does not convince you simply do not invest in our solution.

5) It is quite the opposite, it is precisely because we have the contacts and the agreements that we need to create a proposal open to the public to give legitimacy to Ebitz. We do not want to create a closed sale like it was the case of Zcash but an open proposal for any user, that is the nature of Ebitz. It would do no good to create a closed proposal, it would have no use. As you know, we established a limit of 500 btc that we expect to achieve but still that amount is not excessive for the nature of our project. And as we said, we will contribute with our own funds (as we have already done) for the development of Ebitz.

Its a pleasure answer your questions, this will help to other users too.

Bye