Quote from: jbreher on November 30, 2016, 05:24:28 AM

Quote from: deisik on November 28, 2016, 06:58:59 PM

Quote from: jbreher on November 28, 2016, 04:38:46 PM

Quote from: deisik on November 28, 2016, 09:50:32 AM

So what's your point really?

You misunderstood what I was saying about the rate of change required to support onchain transaction increases, with our conversation that average recent actual blocksize directly contradicts your assertion that Chinese miners were at that time artificially sabotaging the system by choking transaction inclusion.

So how does that support your claim that everything will be tip-top in the future, when huge block sizes will be possible thanks to the expansion in network bandwidth, storage capacities, processing power, etc?

Well, it obviously will not be, if we do not allow it. I'd like to at least remove the artificial barriers that currently prevent this. Why is that so hard to understand?

Quote

While minor problems, which don't even require the tiniest part of the future technological improvements, still cannot be solved for longer than a year, today?

This is not a technological problem, but rather a self-imposed management problem.

It doesn't matter. Without resolving current issues first, it doesn't make any sense to talk about future requirements and necessary technological advances to meet these requirements. It is not even so much about these issues as such as the lack of any real attempts at coming to a solution. Or, at least, to an agreement about how to resolve them in a constructive way. It is like dreaming about wedding when you have just been walked out on...

You have to deal with reality and harsh facts, and not get lost in wishful thinking and pipe-dreaming

Quote from: jbreher on November 30, 2016, 05:24:28 AM

Quote

And while we are at it, it is still not proven that this transaction jam was not deliberately caused by miners themselves

I struggle with trying to discern any relevance to this.

So why have you been constantly referring to that in your own posts if you don't see any relevance yourself?