Quote from: tee-rex on November 29, 2016, 02:19:56 PM

Quote from: Helix61be on November 29, 2016, 01:53:51 PM

Quote from: tee-rex on November 29, 2016, 10:45:45 AM

Quote from: Red-Apple on November 28, 2016, 04:04:12 PM

I liked the results myself too, you can see this way that the purple line (crypto-games) looks to be the best one so far in this 3 months. and bitvest although being a shot time the worst.

And what was true for a shorter time frame turned out to be even truer for a longer time frame. Crypto-Games appears to be a long run winner even if BetKing's profits are higher all-in-all. They seem to have a pretty large bankroll and a lot of small to middle capitalized players coupled with good bankroll management. What is their max bet to bankroll size ratio?

It would be interesting to evaluate this parameter among casinos.

This is from the cryptogames thread

Quote from: DogecoinMachine on August 30, 2016, 06:47:55 PM

Better have only 0.5% maximum win of bankroll than 10% or even 90% with kelly system. It's called safe bankroll management.

This. And it seems to be the most contributing factor to the consistency of their profits. Better safe than sorry, if that is ever applicable to the house itself. What about other casinos and their bankroll management systems? Does anyone know their maximum allowed bet or win? Methinks, it is possible to develop a strategy of evaluating how safe it is to invest in a certain casino by looking at these figures.

Need to do some simulations and this could be worked out. Looking at it pragmatically 0.5% seems like the winning model so far...