Quote from: johny1976 on November 30, 2016, 06:18:03 PM

Quote from: Lanzador on November 30, 2016, 06:11:53 PM

Quote from: johny1976 on November 30, 2016, 01:33:53 AM

Quote from: Lanzador on November 30, 2016, 01:14:26 AM

Quote from: johny1976 on November 30, 2016, 12:44:57 AM

Quote from: Lanzador on November 29, 2016, 02:38:29 PM

Quote from: johny1976 on November 29, 2016, 10:46:33 AM

Quote from: Bagus Tubagus on November 29, 2016, 10:22:56 AM

Since your game scripts are known by backdoors and bugs, will you or investors cover stolen amounts?

Sorry for ruining your picture about our scripts but this is just not true. Our game scripts have no bugs and have been publicly reviewed.

Well, that's not exactly quite right is it? You guys do have a history of exploitable bugs in your scripts - where can we see their public review? Are they open source?

Yes, we do have. All victims of that poor coding were compensated and the later review was done by some hero member user, I think we had a special thread for that. But it's not true that they are known for "backdoors", they were never there intentionally.

As we said, there's nothing to be worried about. The BetBase code will be reviewed by RHavar and we have much better (and much more expensive Cheesy

) team of coders now who are actually security experts, I am 100% sure everything is well secured.

If you're so confident in your code, then why aren't you waiting for RHavar's review before raising funds?

Because he does the review for his stake of money raised and has tems.

Sorry, not sure exactly what that means?

He didn't want to do a code review before the money are raised. So he can be sure that 3% of his fee will do some reasonable profit for him.

Ah - didn't realize he was actually looking at the code / reviewing it for a fee