Quote from: Lauda on December 01, 2016, 12:43:24 PM

-snip-

Quote from: Stedsm on December 01, 2016, 06:12:59 AM

I saw about the ban theory, and also one thing that people who are banned for the 1st time, they get it for 7 days..
-snip-
All I want to ask you is, can't this be fair in case of negative trust too that the review that takes place after 30 days should be done in 7 days only and give an opportunity to someone to prove themselves innocent?

To cover some things:
1) This is not related to banning, thus this comparison i a 'false equivalency'.
2) The banning policy has become much softer since BadBear is inactive.
3) Where did you get this '30 days review' thing for negative ratings? There is no such. You may be talking about the SMAS blacklist, which has a review period (on request) 30 days after you've been added. However, that has no relevance here.

Considering the circumstances, and your mature acceptance of this situation I think that this warrants a tone down to neutral (which puts you into my watch list). However, if this has landed you on a blacklist by SMAS, then you don't get a second chance early for that.

Thanks a lot for coming here and consider what I wanted to say. I am not on SMAS blacklist currently, that's what I think as I have checked the list and I don't see my name there. The only thing I didn't understand here is what I have put into bold in your statement, I mean if that's your decision to put me in your watch list, what about the negative trust that is still on my profile?

When should I "expect" it to be removed or at least get changed back to neutral? Do I need to wait or will it be removed some time later?
Sorry to ask like this, I feel very ashamed asking this Embarrassed

, but just took a chance by doing so. Wink