Quote from: Dogedigital on December 03, 2016, 01:00:07 PM

Quote from: Lanzador on December 02, 2016, 11:54:23 PM

Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on December 02, 2016, 10:06:35 PM

Quote from: Lanzador on December 02, 2016, 09:03:39 PM

Quote from: DarkStar_ on December 02, 2016, 07:56:35 PM

Quote from: Lanzador on December 01, 2016, 08:15:24 PM

Quote from: BoXXoB on December 01, 2016, 04:37:40 AM

Interesting to see which sites get a slice of the funds now. Shouldn't be too hard to notice where it goes Tongue

there's not that many options after all.

My bet's on CG getting the bulk of them. Only site with solid profit and operational history with no scandals and no whales wiping out the bankroll

Want to make an actual bet? I think Moneypot will get some large investors as they've put in new restrictions preventing those bankroll destroying bets, and have had good profits in the past. A lot of volume at MP as well. BitDice might also get a good share as they've had some solid profit lately, and pretty much in their entire history (except for one day). CG will definitely get some large investments, but I don't think they will get majority.

MP has some sketchy stuff going on and hasn't really been proactive about anything

Curious as to what sketchy stuff? And you are blatantly wrong on us not being "proactive", we have spent a significant amount of time and money on new features that are being released shortly. Some before 2017, some after. We also offer very swift customer support.. How many Bitcoin casinos can say the same?

Negative left for slander. You invested in BetBase and now you are trying to stir down MoneyPot based on your post history.

Apologies Dean for this not being related to Bet King.

I haven't invested a single bit in BetBase. And you talk a lot about all of these features you're going to add - when? You said Rubies a year ago, you said Rubies again in November and you have nothing to show for it.

Your wager size / maximum win changes are all reactionary when someone wiped out your bankroll - just like your anti-DDOS stuff. None of these were changes that were preemptive.

Also, as I said above, I haven't invested a cent into BetBase. If I had, why would I be trying to drive people there right now? I would want to maximize my ICO share, and then once that's over, I would start trying to get people interested in that site. As it is, I have no reason to invest with any of you. My fiat investments are much more safe, legitimate, and profitable than investing into a casino.

-1 for you also. I'll remove mine when you remove yours

I don't mean to de-rail the thread, but I wanted to comment on this.

Rubies was stated to be released in mid July. The deadline was there and 99.99% completed, but due to some abrupt personnel changes, we needed to scrap the whole project and completely reconfigure. We knew it wasn't going to be a popular decision, but it was the right (hard) choice to make for the interest of long-run growth. December 10th is the new estimated timeline for the Rubies along with other changes.

We have been working quite pro-actively as well [I have been working full time weekdays 12 hours a day and there are 3-5 developers working on various projects with a dedicated graphics developer and freelance css designers (but I do agree with you that from an outside view, it wouldn't appear that way). I'd suggest the best thing to do is wait and let the actions speak for themselves.

Getting back to topic, I'm very interested in seeing how BetKing pans out. I do admit it was extremely entertaining to watch whales bet upwards of 5-40btc at a time in a single roll here. I'm enthusiastic for when or if BK brings poker back to the platform

Not only was it 5-40 BTC a roll, 100-300 BTC bets were quite frequent at one point. Highest ones were bigger than 1000 BTC a shot. Guess we won't be seeing much bets of that size anymore.

However, I do think right decision was made regarding Rubies. Though I do understand the point of view of those who expected for Rubies to launch earlier.