Quote from: cakravothy on December 04, 2016, 05:28:54 AM

Quote from: Avirunes on December 04, 2016, 05:13:49 AM

Quote from: bhantom on December 04, 2016, 04:55:37 AM

Quote from: dawnasor on December 04, 2016, 04:20:19 AM

Let Avirunes and Lutpin make a decision for this scenario and im think the payment is fair for all participants that they made.Lets wait the payment come to our wallet.

There is no scenario.. Decision is made! Payment will be tomorrow!
Problem is about rest of escrowed BTC.
Escrow - Lutpin - Have to decide what he will do with this money.

Question is: Give it back to scammer or distribute to participants?

We have to decide about it and we will when time comes. May I know what is basis or reason behind giving back to scammer or distribution rest to participants?

Rest will be remain in the escrow and thats final. It seems like participants are more focussed on 3.1BTC? Kno?

3.1 i think is good, 2 bitcoin have manager campaign and escrow (lutphin and avirunes) , and 1.1 distibution to participants
i think is very bad if give it back to scamer or coin founder

I don't understand your counting completely.

If this money is not going back to the main owner, because he is scammer, it should be distributed equally to all participants. If escrow consider that it is to much for participants, or it is not fair, all this money should be sent to charity.