Quote from: iamnotback on December 05, 2016, 01:25:55 AM

Quote from: jbreher on December 05, 2016, 12:23:39 AM

But posting bullshit as fact is merely posting bullshit as fact.

Facts don't exist in a time-locked vacuum.

Your use of the term "facts" is myopic aliasing error (study the Shannon-Nyquist Sampling Theorem). You refuse to sample the data we have on what always happens next.

You are the bullshitter. The unintentional wolf in sheepskin.

Jeebus, you're off track.

Fact: India has *not* outlawed gold. Bullshit is bullshit.

I got my EE degree decades ago. I've been conversant with the work of Nyquist and Shannon for quite some time, thank you very much.

Yes, it is possible that gold may be outlawed in India tomorrow. But it is not today. And the Nyquist sampling theorem makes quite clear that one cannot extrapolate a future sample from the current. If you are using it at all, then you are misapplying the theory to which you claim to ascribe.

You are trying to tell me that my sampling frequency is not high enough to avoid aliasing? You've not even described what signal it is that you are sampling. What is the amplitude in your function supposed to denote? Is it periodic in the time domain? If not, you cannot convolve to the frequency domain.

Fact: India has *not* outlawed gold. Bullshit is bullshit.