What bullshit.
What's the rationale behind this hiding someone's posts without telling them that it's being done?
rbtc can't tell people that it's being done because then they'd have to admit that they too moderate things, which would break their narrative that the difference between rbtc and rbitcoin is that rbtc is 'uncensored'.
What definition of "public figure" do they use?
Apparently one that defines Gavin Andresen as not a public figure but defines me as one (since no action is taken about the basically daily stream of attack comments naming me on rbtc-- ... though I never asked for any action to be taken with respect to them other than letting me post rebuttals, but they've taken that away.)
But whatever, it's their site-- they can have dumb rules.
Never mind. Rules are there to break them. The result of all that little drama might be that you are now back here in best forum a bit more?
Why you just don't use this chance and make the 'need' of different forums obsolet by working on a reunion of the split community and find out about a best consensus in scaling that will include all proper possibilities like on- and off chain scaling in one go?