Quote from: actmyname on December 06, 2016, 10:21:46 PM

Quote from: cjmoles on December 06, 2016, 10:15:54 PM

I'm am just curious: will there be a system by which we can secretly send some bitcoin to an address in order to avoid getting targeted by these blacklists? Or, will there be any other system put in place as an assurance that members wont indiscriminately be placed on these lists?

Users are placed on the blacklist when they are spammers. Are you afraid of being labeled as one such?

Why would you possibly need any insurance if you were to simply post quality replies? That being said... your post history is quite interesting. It seems you only post in the final week of the month... and quite a numerous amount, I must say! Is that because your signature campaign is monthly, and you need to pump out posts for the quota?

If the idea were implemented (which it won't) then quite simply no one (significant enough) would be on the blacklist. Anyone that wants to continue shitposting will do so, with a simple one-time fee. But I don't think SMAS would be very keen to bribery attempts.

Let's see.....

cjmoles: 52 posts (November 23, 2016 to December 01, 2016)
actmyname: 58 posts (November 23, 2016 to December 01, 2016)

52 < 58...right?

So, 52 posts is "quite a numerous amount" and subject to criticism, but 58 posts, most of which are only minutes apart, in the same period is fine? I don't get your logic there. And, if you're insinuating that my posts aren't as constructive as yours, then maybe you should re-examine them.

See, the above criticism is exactly why I was curious....some people are overly criticized while others are given a pass. I was just wondering if there was some sort of secret procedure, or group, that is handing out these passes....that's all.