Quote from: Johny Depp on December 06, 2016, 06:03:17 PM

/u/nullc is exposing HashFast cloud mining scammer

HashFast had nothing to do with "cloud mining." Perhaps you should understand the subject matter thoroughly before parroting the hivemind's libelous, outdated, and provably counterfactual narrative (which was largely written and promulgated by GMAX).

GMAX isn't "exposing" anyone, he is continuing a campaign of online defamation and harassment against targets that according to the Bankruptcy Court have been cleared of the "scammer" accusation.

GMAX is still obsessed with getting a risk-free appreciated-BTC windfall refund for his ultra-risky ASIC preorder. LOL.

GMAX was sent a refund check for 105% of the purchase price, but was too pure (IE stubborn) to cash it and thus admit the once-popular 'we-all-deserve-windfall-refunds' entitlement theory is flawed.

This is the only time I've seen him be wrong about something, so it's not surprising he doesn't know how to accept fault, change his mind, and move on.

As Dr. Back says, 'if you find yourself disagreeing with GMAX about a technical matter, you're probably wrong.' But this is a cluster of legal matters and the Dunning-Kruger effect prevents GMAX from reaching correct conclusions about scam vs bankrupt, doxing vs TOS, etc.

Quote from: thejaytiesto on December 06, 2016, 11:17:49 PM

If you look at the facts it's clear that being banned from reddit because of that is absolute nonsense.

GMAX's libel and harassment eventually caused Cypherdoc to delete all his forum/social accounts, to the detriment of those who enjoyed his legendary GOLD COLLAPSING BITCOIN UP posts (and his silly Gavinista moaning/ranting as well).

Cypherdoc values his personal privacy/security and never intended for his handle to be connected to his True Name. That connection only occurred as a result of the (disastrous/useless) bankruptcy lawsuit.

GMAX knows this, and likes to twist the knife as frequently as possible by mentioning cypher's True Name in connection with the (now debunked) scammer accusation.

It's very fitting that this illegal and obnoxious pattern of behavior brought down the Reddit admin BANHAMMER. Cypherdoc is a man of means, and Conde Naste doesn't want to be held responsible should anything bad happen to Cypherdoc subsequent to his doxxing/defamation happening on their site.

You might think given how much GMAX complains about r/btc's similarly baseless and defamatory campaign of personal destruction against him, he would know better than to do the same thing to Cypherdoc, especially since the HashFast+Frap.doc scam accusation had 2 years of intense courtroom litigation to find proof of scam, yet went nowhere.