Quote from: obit33 on December 09, 2016, 01:49:30 PM

Quote from: bathrobehero on December 09, 2016, 12:31:11 PM

Pseudo-anonimity is good enough for me.

What I find hilarious is that 96.52% of Monero's volume belongs to a single, centralized exchange (polo) which also require people's identity. Until that's fixed I'm not sure how people can push Monero.

this is false, if you stay under the 2k$-withdrawal limit you don't need to give up your identity...

pseudo-anonimity is not good enough for everyone... I for one wouldn't like to be associated with shady business because a bitcoin was used for some shady business 7 transactions ago (when I had nothing to do with that bitcoin)...

cash needs to be fungible, bitcoin is not fungible because its traceable...

best regards,

You are not associated, basing associations like that in and of itself is plain stupid. It's like being a suspect of a crime because you walked down the same street where someone committed a crime a month later you were there.

There's no 2k$ anon limit. Level 1 verification (2k$ limit) requires your name already. And even then you're pretty much at the mercy of Poloniex regarding when they will require full identification.

Anonimity is not that important to me but even then an anon coin with its entire trading volume happening on one single US exchange is just trash to me.

If anonimity were more important to me, I'd much rather want to avoid using exchanges with FinCEN/AML/KYC first than just using full anon coins.