Quote from: shorena on December 11, 2016, 07:56:08 PM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on December 10, 2016, 10:25:22 PM

Quote from: shorena on December 10, 2016, 04:38:49 PM

I stated a few posts back that I will not accept a link to that page as proof for connections between addresses. Id like to be able to verify the information. Linking to walletexplorer makes it easy for the accuser and tedious for the verifier. I prefer the SHA-2 way, difficult to find, easy to verify. Others on DT might see this differently, its just my personal view.

You mean like how two Alts will create PGP Keys withing days of each-other as proof they are Alts?

That kind of thing?

I wouldnt not accept that either, yes.

"But of course you would say that."

I'm sorry you feel my work isn't up to your own high standards. Without the proof of Wallet Addresses being in the same Wallet, or such things as coinciding dates, you've set yourself a pretty high bar to hurdle, and I'm kind of stumped what you would accept as proof?