Quote from: Zer0Sum on December 11, 2016, 11:56:13 PM

Quote from: Seccour on December 11, 2016, 10:28:48 PM

Quote from: Zer0Sum on December 11, 2016, 10:25:39 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 11, 2016, 06:37:21 PM

I never make anything personal. I am here to discuss only the observable events that take place. I stand by what I said though that this is the worst distributional method for alts and this project (for many reasons already stated above) that I have seen yet.

The added fact there is refusal to null the top 2-5%of wallets which would hardly affect how broad the distribution is yet prevent all the exchange issues, ICO's using their windfalls against the project and super whales pumping and dumping everyone over and over is strange although I see no gain for tonych from refusing.

Come on Tonych keep 10% for dev and wages and just make it a POW launch. BB will be a pariah coin with the alt coin community I can guarantee it once word is out beyond this thread. Auto creating Whales in new ALT currencies on the basis of them being whales in BTC already with no risk to them at all is simply not going to go over well. That and handing exchanges and ICO teams super whale portions is even more undesirable.

You seem so smart there must be another angle to this that you are not revealing. There is no way you would be funding your competition and making sure investors don't ever touch this coin for fear of huge whale manipulation. Fess up there is some other reason for this and I don't mean your personal self enrichment. What is it?

Right now 7 accounts control 60.3% of the distribution... a disaster.

A whale skewed distribution is only good for whale pumping/dumping and never corrects itself over time...
It's not about "fairness", this distribution never builds a wide, stable community... so what is Tony really trying to achieve.

I would suggest using LOG or LN on balances to create a much wider distribution...

For example,

ln(1000) = 6.9
ln(100) = 4.6
ln(10) = 2.3

So someone with 1000 BTC only gets about 3 times what 10 BTC gets you...
You wanna be radical and start with a large diverse community... LN is your friend.

Split your BTC and different address and that's it.

ln(20) < ln(10) + ln(10)

OK, then same applies to having a cap of 100 BTC or whatever...
Then say the distribution will be democratized using a proprietary alogrithm...
I'm sure people have done serious work on this...
As it stands, this project has gone from being a refreshing longshot to a mainstream P&D by the usual suspects.

Let's wait and see. There is 12-13 days left before the snapshot. That let plenty of time for people to link there addresses. We will see how the distribution evolve.