Quote from: shutyourmouth on December 17, 2016, 09:20:03 PM

Quote from: mtnsaa on December 17, 2016, 08:51:20 PM

Quote from: shutyourmouth on December 17, 2016, 08:42:49 PM

Quote from: mtnsaa on December 17, 2016, 04:47:47 PM

Quote from: TheKB on December 17, 2016, 04:38:33 PM

Quote from: mtnsaa on December 17, 2016, 04:32:08 PM

Quote from: rgornik on December 17, 2016, 02:51:20 PM

Quote from: mtnsaa on December 15, 2016, 09:22:23 PM

Quote from: rgornik on December 15, 2016, 08:40:51 PM

Quote from: bitpotter on December 15, 2016, 08:26:48 PM

I see ChronoBank is the next ICONOMI Wink

Hardly. Its a good project but its potential growth is smaller. First, adoption of crypto world in many countries is quite slow (from people point of view and also from government). Secondly, their idea can be much easier copied (it is not so revolutionary as Iconomi). And thirldy, Iconomi team made before Cashilla which is kind a complementary with Iconomi. Chronobank did not do anything similar in the past

I won't comment if ChronoBank will be successful or not long term since it's all speculation and we are still years away of crypto going truly mainstream. However your arguments could be applied just the same to Iconomi. They seem to have plenty of connections and experience with real companies and employees, they are not coming from nothing. If they manage to cut expenses compared to other options as they said, their business will flourish. I think this is similar to Lykke (that's much more focused on banking, money transfer, etc but I believe they still aim for services exchanges).

I think what distinguishes ChronoBank from other cryptoprojects is that LH tokens will actually have parity with current real world currencies. Let's face it, ETH, BTC, XMR are hardly spent or used daily because people hoard them. Volatility is the final nail on the coffin and the reason you can't really build a real world/daily business strictly based on cryptocurrencies other than a exchange or a betting site Grin

The time tokens on the other hand are basically company shares which will receive dividends if the company grows (just like ICN).

I was a bit unfair to note just what I see from negative side. Of course your comment summarizes good points which I agree. I am still worried about those negative sides though

I've been doing some more research on ChronoBank and you can read a great review at https://www.smithandcrown.com/participate-chronobank-crowdsale/

What's very interesting is this Edway group...they are basically coming up with Chronobank to solve their own problems, so that basically guarantees the project will have clients and employees already. This is a major advantage since it's basically the hardest part for any ico or new company (Iconomi for example will have to heavily promote its service to fiat investors, unless they already have some).

Now, there are a lot of cons and question marks of course too but it's really a genuine and unique approach to actually use bring blockchain to the masses and be a solution, not a possibility. If crypto ever becomes a powerful industry in this new economy projects like Iconomi, Chronobank, Golem, Steem, Factom, Storj/Sia, ArcadeCity, etc, who are focused on a sector, niche or service will be the cornerstones of it.

This assuming they have time to develop before the real boom and keep improving and adapting. That's why old giants like IBM, Microsoft and many others are still kings and trustable companies.

Guys... please fuck your selves elsewhere. no one here gives a shit about your chrono cunt fuck.

Actually we are discussing this because Iconomi most likely already invested on the ICO for the performance fund, so please don't be disrespectful.

Your excuse to talk about Chrono proves you know very little about the investment process. First of all everything is transparent and all investments can be seen here: https://ico.iconomi.net/about-icnx-index Second Iconomi will not consider investing into any ICO as any crypto has to be at least two months old to be considered in the Index. Please find your dumb investors elsewhere. Your presence here screams FOMO.

WTF are you talking about? While it's not confirmed, Iconomi could potentially invest in this ICO, just as it already did with Golem (surprise, you don't even know what we are talking about here, it's the performance fund not the index, get a clue).

I'm not shilling this ICO, we are just discussing it because there's speculation based on photos of Iconomi team with Chronobank people, just like it happened with Kraken. Wings DAO is a another ICO that I think Iconomi will take part in if it didn't already happen.

So please do your research first and understand the difference between the index and the performance fund before calling names and writing nonsense.

I didn't even realize the performance fund has already invested into Golem. I'm catching up on these articles now. I get that you think your accusations are solid theories now. But this thread is still for the Fund management platform. I do not want to hear your hopes and dreams with fake news.

Dude, we are not debating or discussing something that is not related to Iconomi, I know it's not confirmed but many are certainly sure that Iconomi already invested so that's why we are looking into it (I'm thinking of investing myself since there's a lot of time left). Performance fund would be the only way to get dividends before OFM is released so I think it's pretty important to analyze where our money is going. Golem, Chronobank and Wings are ok for me but I don't think they are very exciting really, not sure if they will be profitable for us. At least like I researched Chronobank will have a established (small) userbase already to work with. I don't understand Wings DAO at all and Golem is too technical for me too as I don't really see the mainstream market.