(Precondition: Your address exists as a single output in a transaction that has ben cemented in the bitcoin blockchain)
The transaction can have multiple outputs too, you can just add a new number after that "3" representing the
index (
refHi,
You are right. I talked about the possibility of adding another indirection level when mentioning the drawbacks (please mind the
25 after the 3). I didn't want however to present it as the general case as it introduces more complexity.
"Using a second level of indirection would help here, by pointing to a transaction with multiple outputs E.g: BTC.443860.3.25.56318"
I will address your other points in a separate post.