Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on December 20, 2016, 02:53:09 PM

Quote from: bering on December 20, 2016, 10:09:01 AM

i have no connection with Omikifuse and better check your source before accusing someone
proof https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1037386.msg11245533#msg11245533

Sure brother.I'm very solid about my sources and I verify it twice before blindly connecting the dots.
You made a mistake here too ?

Quote from: bering on September 22, 2015, 05:00:12 PM

i would like to join this campaign
Name: bering
Post count: 146
Rank: full member
Bitcoin address: 1GZFowyJStpTapktmEGBBY5s1xZAcksHav
please confirm me

Archived

Now it's proven you've tendencies to lie.And you're a fortunejack shit poster which is why I started finding your alts.

Quote from: Avirunes on December 20, 2016, 10:15:57 AM

I guess he used the forum search so I guess he might have been checking for address only.

No,I actually compare post history/social network connections etc because accounts could be sold.

Joel, your connection is faulty.

Firstly, you're quoting instances of bering stating their own address, which is 1GZFowyJStpTapktmEGBBY5s1xZAcksHav. This is since Omikifuse posted only after bering did, and not the other way around. Along with that, Omikifuse had stated that they posted the wrong address.

However, even if Omikifuse did not post that (or they lied) there is ONLY a connection from Omikifuse to bering, but not vice versa.

All the negative history of bering should be transferred to Omikifuse if they are linked, but not the other way around. The reason for this is simple: if a scammer were to post a person's address, is it correct to link the non-scammer to the scammer? No. But if it were the other way around, where I for example post that my address is a scammer's, then I should be linked to the scammer's past history... but not the other way around (unless it's incredibly likely).