Quote from: mrbodz on December 22, 2016, 12:56:49 PM

A bright idea for once, Your correct we all did. That plan was the plan we were following, until you decided you wernt happy with the changes in the DGC Foundation as documented here:

https://forum.digitalcoin.co/threads/1699-Why-I-m-Resigning-the-Title-of-quot-President-quot-of-the-Digitalcoin-Foundation/page2

I dont believe non coders are second class citizens, however your extremely stupid to be telling people their coding is shit when you dont know how to code yourself.

BlockchainMechanic, you really should let DGC die its slow death, most of the team tried to bring it to life and were brought back down. A V5 would just really be stupid

Ahmed

Just repeating what I've heard. Admittedly I really don't know much other than what I've been told.

I don't know why you're quoting that guy, but I was asked to engage with him by multiple people. One thing for sure though, is that you're still trying to keep people away from DGC and I don't understand why.

Whether it's code or attitude, not sure, but comments like this:

Quote from: mrbodz on May 16, 2015, 12:30:02 AM

Approval IS needed from me and xawksaw. Submit a PR. If all works okay then it'll be pulled in and approved.

Ahmed

And responses from potential developers like this:

Quote

Well it seems you have a great coin there, however I see your problem, having read both threads, and venturing into the DGC IRC.

The biggest issue I see is a few bad apples you have that are very disruptive and one unfortunately is one of your Dev's, and having the likes of gamegear sat in the IRC and being shoved right up ahmed's arse is a recipe for disaster.

I know as I have had dealings with both in the past, and it has not ended well.

Have made it very difficult for DGC to evolve.

Blockchain Mechanic, if you do decide to work on DGC, feel free to call on me for any assistance I can provide. There are likely still a few supporters who may also be willing to help in any way they can.

TT