Quote from: cryptohunter on December 24, 2016, 03:53:55 PM

Quote from: tonych on December 24, 2016, 03:48:05 PM

I contacted Sasha Ivanov, founder of Waves, about the linked address 1NGfrU4YNp8dox1gLeUDyjD5Vpfck9no5j that has 4800 BTC from Waves ICO. His response was that if the project is successful, he is going to distribute our coin as dividend to Waves holders.

So, even the largest (so far) whale in our distribution is a kind of collective investment entity.

What people say and what people do are sometimes not the same thing.

Should have been nulled like the other huge wallets. Project is destroyed before it starts. The enriching the richest automatically does not go over well with most of the crypto community.

+1

It is like if an exchange registers their Bitcoin wallet, then claims it will give the Byteballs to their users as dividents, if (note the IF) the project is successful Grin

They are leaving themselves a space to cheat with that "if" statement. In any case having 10% of supply in hands of a single person (even if he promises to distribute it later) is dangerous.

In case if you decide to keep this linked address, please at least post it in Waves thread, so Waves investors are informed, and could request their share!

Quote from: jwinterm on December 24, 2016, 04:03:08 PM

This one just popped up while I was finishing mine:
XCQ3LC6BSRGLPKC6LDQBTHZBKHLGIS5B 3HsSR84zReeBt5fTMESWJ2y18pMo5gz2Sq 12295.96991428 20.5916 tx

12.2k BTC Shocked

At the moment going to get 20% of distribution.

Heavy players (cheaters or not.. doesn't matter too much in this case) are popping in... I guess it would be fair to limit the number of Byteballs going into single Byteball address... not to exceed 1-2% of supply... What about that? Otherwise distribution is going to be f**ked up.