Quote from: Puffy23 on December 25, 2016, 03:24:20 PM

Quote from: fmz89 on December 25, 2016, 11:42:53 AM

Quote from: Amph on December 25, 2016, 07:07:27 AM

Quote from: Puffy23 on December 24, 2016, 11:18:25 PM

Quote from: Amph on December 24, 2016, 09:59:38 PM

Quote from: Puffy23 on December 24, 2016, 05:19:59 PM

Quote from: Slava_K on December 24, 2016, 05:16:38 PM

No, now 430 hash for 1070...

See edits. Still isn't worth it...

Further Edit:

Efficiency Setup - at equal power use for comparison without power costs impacting the analysis.
Edit: Edit:
Card Price Hash/s Power (W) H/$
1070 $400 380 100 0.95
Fury $260 300 100 1.15

Full Bore Setup
Card Price Hash/s H/$
1070 $400 430 1.075
Fury $260 350 1.346

The 1070 has a long way to go before it's worth a look. The entry cost of $400/card is just too steep to overcome without some serious hash.

it's wrong, the 1070 do 380 at 100watt not 330

If you did a little math yourself you'd see at 380 it's still not wrong. AMD is still ahead of Nvidia in H/$ running efficiently AND running full bore. Even with the adjusted numbers the 1070 is still 20% less H/$. AMD dead?? It's still in the LEAD.

Edit: AMD guys are quibbling over 0.5% using ssl and 2%-4% in pool variance.
Nvidia guys are paying a 20% premium just to play the game and screaming victory. It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

it is because 380 sol is always better than 300 sol at the same wattage, you need 25% more uselesses components with 300 sol to have the same total hash

you must remember than on large scale the less rig you haev that do the job the better

even i dont have nvidia, pascal its truly win, amd fanboys need to admite that,
well considering to build nvidia rig,
hope vega or polaris refresh bring amd to the top again Shocked

haha old gpu will die soon ~~the tahiti king~~ wont pop again

380 sol is always better than 300 sol at the same wattage...?? Not when that 27% increased hash costs 54% more $$. That statement shows a complete lack of understanding ROI. Cost matters.

So lets take a look at the extra components.

MB: $80
RAM: $40
CPU: $40
HDD: $40
OS: $40
PSU: $160
5 USB Risers: $50
16x Shielded Riser: $50
Case and Fans: $100
Total: $600

Fury Rig: $600 + $1,560 = $2,160
1070 Rig: $600 + $2,400 = $3,000

Card Price Hash/s Power (W) H/$
1070 $3,000 2,280 100 0.76
Fury $2,160 1,800 100 0.83

Full Bore Setup
Card Price Hash/s H/$
1070 $3,000 2,580 0.86
Fury $2,160 2,100 0.97

So as you can see, even with the cost of supporting parts included the Fury is still a better deal in H/$ running efficiently and running full bore.

For those asking about the Fury power usage, this has been covered over and over again on the forum. I did the math, you can do your own reading. There are over 100 Furys running rock solid 300H/s with 100W. And as others have pointed out, the Nano is pushing 325H/s with 90W-95W.

haha amd noobs, show me thats 325 sol in nano at 90watt?? show me yur wattmeter, lol