Quote from: nerdralph on December 27, 2016, 01:45:58 PM

Quote from: Lucky - Luciano on December 26, 2016, 07:40:50 PM

Quote from: nerdralph on December 26, 2016, 04:36:22 PM

Quote from: Claymore on December 26, 2016, 08:24:49 AM

Quote from: nerdralph on December 26, 2016, 04:22:09 AM

Maybe you don't have such a sense of humor...
You also don't seem to understand how copyright law works. It restricts copying, not reverse engineering.

It seems you should learn a bit.
The License file is a part of miner package. Besides copyrights, it also describes what you may do and what you may not. Do you state that you may ignore "License.txt"? If so, that's what I mean when I say that some devs don't respect licenses.

You are almost paranoid about people learning how your code works, yet it's been over a month since I publicly described how to implement a ZEC miner that is significantly faster than yours.

Then why do not you do a miner ?

There hasn't been enough incentive to do it. If someone offered a large enough payment, I could write a Linux ZEC miner that is at least 10% faster than Claymore 9.2, and probably have it finished in under 30 days.

You can add a 2% devfee just like Claymore does and make much more than 10BTC.