Quote from: SgtSpike on April 03, 2013, 10:22:05 PM

Quote from: BR0KK on April 03, 2013, 10:06:15 PM

Quote from: Unacceptable on April 03, 2013, 09:11:30 PM

Quote from: Syke on April 03, 2013, 09:06:09 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 06:44:44 PM

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

75% of 40 GH/s is 30 GH/s. The device didn't come close to the required speed for the bet. The bet was clearly won.

It was a 30GH unit (Little SC),not the 40 or 60GH unit..............................

Does this make this any better? Was the little SC even included in the bet? Common opinion is that this is not the case?!

Well, I'm not sure anyone confirmed how many chips were in it either. If they were running a full 8 chips @ 25GH/s, then it doesn't come close to 75%.

Sad thing with their information politics we will never know .... Speculating is all we have :/